Paranormal
In the past century, we have experienced an overwhelming social transformation. We are moving towards what one scholar, Bertram Gross, calls "friendly fascism" or socialism. We may already be there. When the difference between lies and truth no longer means anything, we become easy to manipulate-fair game for "mass media, world spanning corporations, armies and intelligence agencies," he wrote. " Meanwhile, the majority of people have little input into the decisions that affect their families, workplaces, schools, neighborhoods, towns, cities, country, and the world".
Our Founding Fathers revolted against the near-totalitarian government of the English monarchy. But they knew that having no government at all would lead to chaos. So they set up a Constitutional Republic with a very limited government. They knew that men prospered in freedom, and it was Thomas Jefferson who said, "the government that governs least, governs best." Jefferson knew that if government were not enslaved, people soon would be.
This is the case in all communist and socialist countries. Socialism is usually defined as government ownership and/or control over the basic means of production and distribution of goods and services. When analyzed this means government controls everything, including you. This means no private property, eliminating the family and wiping out religion. We are being socialized in America and everybody knows it. The individual pushing hardest for socialism have their own personal wealth protected in family trusts and tax-free foundations. Families like the Rockefellers, the Fords, and J.P Morgan (the Insiders) are for every socialist program known to man which will increase our taxes. yet they pay little, if anything, in taxes themselves. An article published by the North American Newspaper Alliance in August of 1967 tells how the Rockefellers pay practically no income taxes despite their vast wealth. The article reveals that one of the Rockefellers paid a grand total of $685 in personal taxes during that year. The Kennedys have their Chicago Merchandise Mart, their mansions, yachts, planes, etc., all owned by their myriads of family foundations and trust. Taxes are for the peons! All their actions betray them as power seekers. Although Rockefeller may insist that he wields no real "power," and here in the United States his name rarely appears in the news, citizens of other nations have some difficulty with his demure attitude toward his own world position. In some countries, particularly in Latin America, where loans from Rockerfeller's Chase Manhattan Bank propped up tyrannical regimes, his mere presence causes riots. Rockefeller's 1986 visit to Argentina set off the worst domestic uprising that country had seen in years.
The fact of the matter is that these men are very powerful and extremely influential in creating policies in the world. They are the insiders. How did they attain such powerful positions? And just how powerful are they?
First of all, we must ask this. Where do governments get the enormous amounts of money they need? Most comes from taxation; but government often spends more than they are willing to tax their citizens and so are forced to borrow. Our national debt is several trillion dollars and growing-every cent of it borrowed at interest from somewhere. The public is led to believe that our government borrows from "the people" through savings bonds. Actually, only the smallest percentage of the national debt is held by individuals in this form. Most government bonds, except those owned by the government itself through it's trust funds, are held by vast banking firms known as International Banks.
Whenever a business firm borrows big money its creditors obtain a voice in management to protect its investment. Like a business, no government can borrow big money unless it is willing to surrender some measure of its sovereignty as collateral. Certainly international bankers who have loaned hundreds of billions of dollars to governments around the world command considerable influence in the policies of such governments.
Nothing drives government deeply into debt like a war; and it has not been uncommon practice among international bankers to finance both sides of the bloodiest military conflicts. For example, during our Civil War the North was financed by the Rothchilds through their American agent, August Belmont, and the South through the Erlangers, Rothchilds relatives. Once the government is in debt to the bankers it is at their mercy. A frightening example was cited by the London Financial Times of September 26, 1921, which revealed that even at that time, "Half a dozen men at the top of the Big Five Banks could upset the whole fabric of government finance by refraining from renewing Treasury Bills". These international bankers owned as private corporations the Central Banks of various European nations and wished to do the same in the United States, which the founding father were strictly against.
Except for a brief interlude, the US operated without a true central bank from the time of its founding until 1913, a period of 124 years. From the earliest days, the founding fathers had been conscious of attempts to control America through money manipulation, and they carried a running battle with the international bankers. Thomas Jefferson wrote to John Adams: "...I sincerely believe, with you, that banking establishments are more dangerous than standing armies....." Karl Marx said that the establishment of a central bank was ninety percent of socializing a country.
Through manipulation and propaganda these powerful and influential men were able to "stage" the panic of 1907 in which people lost faith in the banks and pulled their money out causing many banks to fail. All of this was part of J.P. Morgan and others plan to start a Central Bank in America, but they knew the term "central bank" had to be avoided because the people didn't want it. What they came up with was the Federal Reserve System, and with their money and influence it was not difficult to manipulate President Woodrow Wilson to get the Federal Reserve Act Bill passed. When the Federal Reserve system was foisted on an unsuspecting American public, there were absolute guarantees that there would be no more boom and bust cycles. The men who, behind the scenes, were pushing the central bank concept for the international bankers faithfully promised that from then on there would be only steady growth and perpetual prosperity. However, Congressman Charles A. Lindenbergh Sr. accurately proclaimed: "From now on depressions will be scientifically created". Using a central bank to create alternate periods of inflation and deflation, and thus whipsawing the public for vast profit, had been worked out by the international bankers to an exact science. Having built the Federal Reserve as a tool to consolidate and control wealth, the international bankers were now ready for a major killing. Between 1923 and 1929, the Federal Reserve expanded (inflated) the money supply by sixty-two percent. Much of this new money was used to bid the stock market up to dizzying heights. This was the stock market crash of 1929 and it was no accident. It was followed by the worst depression in U.S. history. Although we have not had another depression of that magnitude, we have suffered regular recessions. Each of these has followed a period in which the Fed tromped down hard on the money accelerator and then slammed on the brakes. It is clear that those who run the Federal Reserve run the country.
What are the insiders plans for America or the world? In the Fall and Winter of 1989, communism collapsed in Eastern Europe. By mid-1990, the once-mighty Soviet Union was in economic and political ruin. In the late summer of 1990, Iraq invaded Kuwait, and the following spring America and her allies-on the strength of superior technology and dynamic leadership-crushed Iraq's military force in a lightning-fast, one-hundred-hour war that was witnessed, via satellite, by virtually the entire world. Against this backdrop of history, from the podium of the legislative chamber of the United States House of Representatives, the elected president of the United States of America announced the beginning of a "New World Order".
The world of 1917 differed from both 1782 and 1848, yet Woodrow Wilson called for a new world order in 1917. The world in 1938 differed from that of 1917, yet Adolph Hitler called for his new world order in 1938. And the world of 1968 differed from that of 1938, yet Nelson Rockefeller called for his new world order in 1968. Can it be that the phrase new world order means something entirely different to the inner circle of a secret society (the insiders) than it does to the ordinary person?
The Insiders are the spiritual descendants of the Illuminati, inheritors of the conspiratorial crest. They have names like Rothschild, Morgan, Carnagie and Rockefeller. The most important of the Insiders' regular meeting places in the conspiracies' modern era is the Henry Pratt House, on West 68th Street in Manhattan, home to the Council on Foreign Relations(CFR). Since its founding in the aftermath of World War I, the CFR has been the intermediary between the world of high finance, big oil, corporate elitism, and the U.S. government. Its members slide smoothly into cabinet-level jobs in Republican and Democratic administrations. The policies promulgated in its quarterly journal, FOREIGN AFFAIRS, becomes U.S. government policy. hrough the CFR and its offshoot, David Rockefeller's Trilateral Commission(TC), the Insiders program a destructive course for America.
The goal of the Council on Foreign Relations is to establish a "One World Government," or a "New World Order," according to the John Birch Society. Sounds pleasant, but the reality, Birchers say, will be a commie/illuminoid nightmare with the Insiders in charge. The grand design of the Insiders is nothing short of total world power. World government will redistribute the world's wealth among all nations, resulting in "a reduced standard of living for Americans." Worse yet, there will "no longer be any freedom of movement, freedom of worship, private property rights, free speech, or freedom of the press. In its own literature, the Trilateral Commission list "collective management" of global "interdependence" as its objective. Defending the Trilateral Commission, David Rockefeller said, "Far from being a coterie of international conspirators with designs on covertly ruling the world, the TC is, in reality, a group of concerned citizens interested in fostering great understanding and cooperation among international allies....." (New York Times 1980). Rockefeller also says he finds the charge that all Trilateralist are of one mind "totally absurd". There is no "Trilateral conspiracy." "The commission is merely a forum for discussion and has no power anyway". But is it powerless? The membership roster since its creation reads like a who's who in politics and big business. Perhaps the most elite of the elitist think tanks. Presidents, chiefs of staff, secretaries of state, directors of the Central Intelligence Agency, industrialist, financiers, media moguls and academic authorities wander in and out of the building housed in Manhattan. The power of the Establishment is beyond question. Since 1940 every United States secretary of state except for one (former Governor James Byrnes of South Carolina) has been a CFR/TC member. And since 1940, all secretary of war/defense, from Henry L. Stimson through the current Clinton appointee, have been CFR members. The CIA during most of the years since its creation has been under CFR control, starting with Allen Dulles, charter member of the CFR. In fact almost all cabinet level positions in the White House have been filled by CFR/TC member, Republican and Democrats. This is how they keep power through presidential transitions across party lines. Former President Jimmy Carter, the hand pick president of Rockefeller, the Insiders' "outsider", given CFR/TC media backing, admitted that the cabinet positions selection was "out of his hands". Government is not the only place where CFR and TC members exists. There are members in all the major newspapers, publications and television networks, virtually the entire media, thus giving the insiders the power of the press and the ability the manipulate the entire country or world.
The present United Nations organization is actually the creation of the CFR and is housed on land in Manhattan donated to it by the family of current CFR chairman David Rockefeller. According to State Department Publication 2349, entitled "Report to the President on the results of the San Francisco Conference" submitted by CFR member and then secretary of State Edward Stettinius, "a committee on post-war problems was set up before the end of 1939 at the suggestion of the CFR. Imagine, two years before the United States entered World War II, the CFR was already planning how to order the world when the war was over! We may assume from this initiative that the entry of the U.S. into World War II was certain to these people two years before the attack on Pearl Harbor. For the sceptics, please note that the Rockefeller Foundation in 1946 appropriated over $139,000 to produce a history of the United States' entry into World War II which would counter any "revisionist" histories that might argue that we were tricked into war by the Roosevelt Administration, the way several highly successful academic studies of World War I demonstrated in the 1920's and 1930's. Let us not forget how profitable wars can be. In fact, at the same time American was spending trillions of dollars on it military machine and sending troops to Vietnam. Rockefeller was financing the Soviets and the Vietnamese with oil refineries and aluminum plants. Only the absence of a formal declaration of war in Vietnam keeps the Rockefellers from being actionable for treason.
We may never know the truth about these things but we must ask why these things are not brought out by the media. Isn't there one branch of the media devoted expressly to the truth? Aren't newspapers and television news programs still devoted to letting us know what's really going on in the world? Both the American Legion and Veterans of Foreign Wars have resolutions demanding congressional investigations of the CFR/TC but for now we must ask questions of our government, hold them accountable. We must educate ourselves be prepared to find out that not all things happen the way we are told they are.
Read about NWO events in human history.
